In an action by a broker for commissions, the court did not err, as against the owner, in modifying an instruction requested by him, that the broker could not recover if he did not agree on the terms of sale with the one who purchased from the owner, though the broker procured the sale, by adding that he could not recover if the sale was made after he abandoned the negotiations or the person with whom he was negotiating declined to purchase. Stiewel v. Lally, 89 Ark. 195, 115 S. W. 1134. See also Sec. 558.