(106) Where broker brings principals together, and they enter into contract of exchange; held, that all questions of readiness or ability of performance are presumed to have been agreed upon and passed by the principals as satisfactory. Genatt v. Rubinson, 165 N. Y. Sup. 464.

(107) In broker's action for commissions, evidence held to warrant a jury finding for plaintiff. Johnson v. Doubrowsky, 163 N. W. 589, - Iowa Sup. - .

(108) In an action by agent to recover commission for sale of tract of land, evidence held to show the making of special agreement fixing the commission at a gross sum, not payable until the purchaser pays his first note. Thompson v. Davidson, 162 N. W. 458, - Minn. Sup. - .

(109) Evidence held to sustain finding that plaintiff had contracted with defendant for a percentage on selling price for securing purchasers for defendant's land, and that thereafter he procured purchasers and earned the compensation. Alden v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Land Co., 163 N. W. 133, - Minn. Sup. - .

(110) In an action to cancel a note and mortgage given a broker as compensation for securing a loan, principal's testimony held not to sustain a finding that the broker assured him he could secure an additional loan from another party. Bledsoe v. Lombard, 194 S. W. 518, - Mo. App. - .

(111) In an action by brokers for commission for a purchase of land, evidence held to show that purchaser made an express contract to pay commission to the broker. West v. Kirby Lumber Co., 193 S. W. 172, - Tex. Civ, App. - .

(112) Where broker had right to sell for $9,600, but he thereafter sells for $9,500 by paying the difference; held, that owner's claim that he waived commission of $500 was improbable, and the broker's contention that defendant agreed to make up the difference on other sales would be accepted. Parker v. Seattle Land & Imp. Co., 165 P. 1086, - Wash. Sup. - .

(113) In a broker's action for procuring an exchange of real estate, statement on cross-examination by proposed purchaser that a company, of which he was president, was owner of lots offered to be exchanged for defendant's property, without a showing that the company was formally organized, or existing as a corporation or association, did not justify the inference that the proposed purchaser was entitled to convey the lots. Schmidt v. Dunne, 163 N. Y. Sup. 515.

(114) In an action on note given brokers in payment of commissions for making exchange of land, wherein defendant coun-terclaimed for damages for deceit, evidence held to justify finding that brokers stated land received by defendant was worth $150 an acre, but that defendant inspected it, with full opportunity to investigate, etc. Michaelson v. Schulke, 163 N. W. 228, - Iowa Sup. - .

(115) Claim of owners as justification for refusal to recognize broker's sales as to broker's deception of them concerning the amount for which lots sold to the city; held, improbable. Parker v. Seattle Land & Imp. Co., 165 P. 1086, - Wash. Sup. - .

(116) Broker who agreed to take notes for excess over owner's price, which represented his commission, can not recover from the owner, who refused to make the sale, the full amount of the excess, without proving that the notes would have been worth face value. Weitbree v. Morris, 163 P. 1119, - Colo. Sup. - .

(117) In an action for an agent's compensation for selling land, evidence held not to show that defendants represented absolutely quantity of land they owned, so as to entitle plaintiff to recover compensation based on the contract price, without deduction for shortage in the acreage. Warne v. White, 164 N. Y. Sup. 30.

(118) Owner of property held not liable for commissions, where he verbally put a certain price on land, and at such time the broker brought customers to the owner, who signed an option agreement, which was cancelled, and where, about nine months later, the owner raised the price of said land, after it had cost the owner a considerable sum to secure cancellation of a lease on the premises, and where there may have been other reasons for raising the price, even though the broker procured the same prospective purchasers as previously, who were willing to pay the sum first asked. Becker v. Hollesen, 198 I11. App. 180.

(119) Under contract between landowner and broker which did not require broker, who was given limited time to dispose of property, to have a binding contract delivered by that time, broker, to be entitled to commission, need not produce a purchaser in person. Leland v. Barber, 117 N E. 33, 228 Mass. 144.

(120) Where the brokers were entitled to commission from owner of land, as for a sale, they having procured a purchaser ready, able and willing to meet owner's terms for sale, was prevented by failure of perfect title, or by mere will of owner, despite the language of contract with owner that he would pay commission simply when "consummated." Purcell v. Firth, 167 P. 379, - Cal. Sup. - .

(121) Purchaser of beach property, who stated he wanted ocean-front property, and nothing else, seller's broker stating there would be nothing in front of his lot but a board walk; held, not entitled to relief by way of having easement declared to be in him over beach in front of his property from which seller later sold other lots. Phillips v. West Rockaway Land Co., 163 K Y. Sup. 993; 177 App. Div. 260.

(122) In an action by buyer of farm to recover back from seller $1,000, on account of like amount paid broker who negotiated the sale, the buyer having thereafter paid seller full purchase price, without deduction, seller denying that broker was to receive commission; held, to sustain finding that broker was to receive a commission of $1,000 from seller. Gosswiller v. J arisen, 162 N. W. 45, - Iowa Sup. - .

(123) Broker's reply to letter from member of syndicate, stating that he and the other members would be liable for their share of syndicate transactions and not jointly; held, an acceptance by the plaintiff of the notice of the liabilities of the parties to the account, and an assent thereto, and not a mere acknowledgment. Post v. Thomas, 168 N. Y. Sup. 226, 180 App. Div. 627.