Relatively to the person who was to be the actual purchaser and pay the purchase money, there was no evidence sufficient to show that he knew or took part in the negotiations with the real estate agent mentioned in the preceding headnote or that he was bound by any promise to pay commissions of the agent, or an amount for the latter's making no claim to be interested in the purchase and development of the property. A verdict against him in behalf of the real estate agent was therefore, not warranted by the evidence. Mitchell v. Gifford (Ga. Sup. '10), 67 S. E. 197 (Syllabus.)