In an action to recover upon an agreement by defendant to pay a specified compensation, when notified of the acceptance of an application for a loan addressed to the plaintiff, who was to undertake to procure the loan, it was held that although the evidence showed the acceptance by a corporation of an application made to it by the plaintiff for a loan, it was insufficient to sustain a recovery, because it did not show that the application made to the corporation and accepted by it embraced the same terms, as to rate of interest and time, as had been specified in the application of the defendant. Peet v. Sherwood, 47 Minn. 347, 50 N. W. 929; Illingsworth v. Slosson, 19 I11. App. 612; Kronenberger v. Teshemacher, 101 N. Y. S. 764, 52 Misc. 130; Sparks v. Grassi, 165 N. Y. Sup. 519; McCoy v. Zahn Corporation, 191 P. 20, - Cal. Sup. - .