A broker sued to recover commissions for selling defendant's real estate, and testified that during defendant's absence he exhibited the premises to one who, after defendant's return, purchased for $2,700; defendant testified that it was agreed that the broker was to receive no commission unless he sold for $3,000 during defendant's absence. Held, that it was error, under the evidence, to charge that if the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale he was entitled to recover. Largeant v. Story (Tex. Civ. App. '01), 61 S. W. 977.